Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's score of 73.3. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is much newer and somewhat lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, although it is also somewhat thicker. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little greater pixel number per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior CPU than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a worse video resolution and a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.