Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 324 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's 73.3 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a lot newer than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, it is thicker and a little bit heavier. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch.
Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 312 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a much higher (4K) video definition.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.