Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, having a global score of 81 against 73.3. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, it's just a bit lighter and also a lot newer.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 312 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a back camera with a worse 23 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.