Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is way better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, with an 88.5 score against 73.3. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit thicker than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, it's incredibly lighter and much newer. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster CPU than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip captures clearer pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.