Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's 73.3 general score. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, but it's also heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a better resolution of 1768 x 2208, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit greater display density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a lot better 23 MP resolution and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.