Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-12 | 2019-08-20 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's 73.3 general score. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a incredibly newer and somewhat lighter device than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, although it is way thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 200 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.