Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-05-12 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, getting an 87.9 score against 73.3. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is way newer and a bit lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, but it's also way thicker. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light situations and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.