Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-02-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, having a global score of 77.7 against 76.2. Even though the HTC One M9 is older and thicker than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, it's body is still a little lighter. The HTC One M9 features just a bit better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density.
The HTC One M9 has a bit better processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits processing unit. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The HTC One M9 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the HTC One M9 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.