Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 76.2. Although Motorola One Hyper is incredibly newer than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
Motorola One Hyper's processing unit is very similar to the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom one, both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. Motorola One Hyper takes much better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.