Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 76.2 score against 75.8. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's construction is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released 3 years before. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes way better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way more mega pixels camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S and Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom have really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.