Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-02-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting an 80.1 score against 76.2. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a extremely newer device than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, but it's heavier and notably thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same sensor size, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also counts with a much higher video quality.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.