Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, having a general score of 81 against 76.2. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a incredibly newer phone than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, but it is way heavier and incredibly thicker. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a slightly better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a just a bit lower pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor which provides a way worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.