Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting a score of 88.5 against 76.2. Galaxy Z Flip's design is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but also just a little heavier than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, a bit smaller screen and a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.