Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's score of 76.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner phone than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, although it is also incredibly heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount in each inch in the screen. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.