Compare phones
Asus ZenFone 4
Dual SIMSamsung Galaxy W
I8150, I8150T, I8150B| Global Score | |
| 52.6 | 57.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 4.4, 4.3 | Android 2.3 |
| 2014-01-06 | 2011-08-24 |
| 4.90 x 2.42 x 0.44 inches | 4.55 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 3.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 3.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 233 pixels per inch | 252 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2520 chipset | -- |
| Saltwell (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Single-Core 1400 MHz processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 544MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 7.92 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 4 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 530 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy W has an overall score of 57.8, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 4's global score of 52.6. Galaxy W is a much older and just a little bit thicker device than Asus ZenFone 4, but Samsung could make it a bit lighter anyway. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but Galaxy W has an older 2.3 version and Asus ZenFone 4 has Android 4.4.
The Samsung Galaxy W counts with a bit sharper display than Asus ZenFone 4, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 800 x 480px, the Samsung Galaxy W also counts with a just a bit higher screen density. The Asus ZenFone 4 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy W, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Asus ZenFone 4 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
Galaxy W has a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 4, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy W features greater battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy W captures much clearer pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 4. Both of them have a back facing camera with a 5 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy W not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.