Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's general score of 75.5. Although Google Pixel 3 is just a bit thicker than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, it's somewhat lighter and newer. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a quite better 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little more pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same back camera sensor size, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a better resolution back facing camera.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.