Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-30 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, getting a 78.8 score against 75.5. The Google Pixel 3a is a newer and somewhat lighter phone than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, although it is also a little thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a has just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the same sensor size and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a more MP back camera.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 3a is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.