Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's 75.5 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, even though they were only released 7 months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. The LG V35 ThinQ has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a camera with a lot higher 16 megapixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.