Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's overall score of 75.5. The LG Velvet construction is incredibly newer than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's, but it's just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. LG Velvet features a display that is very similar to the display in Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although the LG Velvet has a little bit worse pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
LG Velvet features more storage to store more games and applications than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than LG Velvet. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
The LG Velvet takes much better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also counts with a way more MP camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The LG Velvet has better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.