Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 75.5. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's construction is notably newer, but a bit thicker and a little heavier than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has 11 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with better video frame rate and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much longer battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.