Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, getting an 81.5 score against 75.5. Moto G 5G is a way newer phone than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, although it's heavier and incredibly thicker. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Moto G 5G has the older 10 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little higher pixel density.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has more memory for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a camera in the back with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G 5G features a much better battery life than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 39% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.