Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, with an 86.2 score against 75.5. These devices work with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a newer phone than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro and Moto G200 5G count with really similar screens, because although the Moto G200 5G has a just a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little faster CPU than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.