Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G8 Power is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, with a 76 score against 75.5. Moto G8 Power's construction is much newer, but heavier and much thicker than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G8 Power has the older 10 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has more RAM. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density.
Moto G8 Power features a slightly better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a lot higher 16 MP resolution camera.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 39% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola Moto G8 Power is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.