Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-30 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's 75.5 general score. The Moto Z Force is an older phone than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Moto Z Force has older 7.0 Nougat version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. Moto Z Force counts with a bit better screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the Moto Z Force also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z Force also counts with a much better 21 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Moto Z Force counts with as much memory for games and applications as the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro one, they have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Moto Z Force not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.