Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Oxford blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's score of 75.5. Motorola One 5G's design is incredibly newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. Motorola One 5G has a screen that's very similar to the display in Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, although the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola One 5G counts with a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One 5G takes better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Motorola One 5G features a much better battery life than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Motorola One 5G not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.