Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, getting a general score of 78.5 against 75.5. The Motorola One Action design is newer, but somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. The Motorola One Action has a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px, a little bit bigger display and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One Action features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola One Action is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.