Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, getting a score of 79.8 against 75.5. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is way newer than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Motorola One Hyper features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Hyper counts with a little better battery duration than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola One Hyper not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.