Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's general score of 75.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Nokia XR20 is way newer than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, it is noticeably heavier and a lot thicker.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Nokia XR20 has a bit sharper screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a slightly better memory for games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia XR20 counts with a superior camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back, higher video frame rate and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
Nokia XR20 has longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 29% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia XR20 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.