Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, having a general score of 83.8 against 75.5. Galaxy A50's body has the same thickness than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it is a little lighter. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, although the Galaxy A50 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit higher pixel density and a bigger display. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A50 has just a bit better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3600mAh. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.