Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, having an 87.7 score against 75.5. The Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is extremely newer, but thicker and heavier than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per inch of display. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy M51 shoots greater videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy M51 has a way better battery life than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.