Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 75.5. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much newer device than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite higher number of pixels per display inch and a bigger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a way better video definition and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features improved battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.