Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is way better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's score of 75.5. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Galaxy S20 is a little thicker than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, it's a bit lighter and also notably newer.
The Galaxy S20 features a little faster processor than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a better pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy S20 has a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a superior camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher video quality.
The Galaxy S20 costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.