Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's global score of 75.5. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is notably newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery life than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a way bigger sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.