Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, having a global score of 95.4 against 75.5. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is a lot newer than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's, although it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little bit higher screen density and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a lot better video quality.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.