Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, getting a global score of 81 against 75.5. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is way newer, but heavier and a lot thicker than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that is just as good as the display in Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger screen. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better battery life than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.