Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, with an 85.6 score against 75.5. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little heavier than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, it's a little thinner and also much newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has older 11 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little higher pixels density and a bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster CPU than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a larger aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.