Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 4's score of 74.2. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version while Asus ZenFone 4 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Moto G200 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than Asus ZenFone 4, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
Asus ZenFone 4 features a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Asus ZenFone 4 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. The Moto G200 5G features a way better camera than Asus ZenFone 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.