Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-10-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than the Asus ZenFone 4, with a general score of 83.8 against 74.2. The Galaxy A50 body has the same thickness than the Asus ZenFone 4, but it is just a bit heavier. Asus ZenFone 4 has a little bit better display than Galaxy A50, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 4. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Asus ZenFone 4 features a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A50 counts with longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 4, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.