Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 4, with an 80.1 score against 74.2. Both devices in this review have the same Android 8.0 Oreo OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user very similar OS features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably newer cellphone than the Asus ZenFone 4, although it is much thicker and a lot heavier.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than Asus ZenFone 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch in the screen. Asus ZenFone 4 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 4 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Asus ZenFone 4. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Asus ZenFone 4 features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same sensor size and a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Asus ZenFone 4 also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features better battery life than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Asus ZenFone 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Asus ZenFone 4. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Asus ZenFone 4, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.