Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-05-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), with a score of 80.1 against 74.5. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an older 8.0 Oreo version while Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL).
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better display than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels amount in each inch of display. Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
The Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.