Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is much better than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's 72.6 global score. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than Asus ZenFone 5Q, but it's somewhat heavier. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better CPU than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) takes better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger aperture.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Asus ZenFone 5Q. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Asus ZenFone 5Q, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.