Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is better than Asus ZenFone 5Q's score of 72.6. Nokia XR20's body is newer, but way heavier and much thicker than Asus ZenFone 5Q. The Nokia XR20 has just a bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia XR20's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although the Nokia XR20 has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia XR20 captures better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Nokia XR20 costs a lot more money than Asus ZenFone 5Q, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.