Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2018-06-11 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's global score of 72.6. The Galaxy A50 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Asus ZenFone 5Q. Asus ZenFone 5Q and Galaxy A50 have extremely similar screens, although the Galaxy A50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit bigger display and a bit greater pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A50 features a bit superior processor than Asus ZenFone 5Q. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Asus ZenFone 5Q features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a way higher 25 MP resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features improved battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.