Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-11 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Metal |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C5 has an overall score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 5Q's 72.6 score. Although Galaxy C5 is a lot older than Asus ZenFone 5Q, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Asus ZenFone 5Q features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a little bit lower pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a larger display.
Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy C5. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Asus ZenFone 5Q shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 5Q has longer battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.