Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Asus ZenFone 5Q's score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Asus ZenFone 5Q. The Asus ZenFone 5Q features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster processing unit than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has superior battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Asus ZenFone 5Q. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Asus ZenFone 5Q, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.