Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-11 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 5Q, getting a 78.9 score against 72.6. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. The Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M20, although it has a little smaller display, a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Asus ZenFone 5Q shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.