Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is better than Asus ZenFone 5Q, getting an 81.2 score against 72.6. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and a little bit thicker than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, it's design is still just a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 5Q, although it has a quite inferior pixel quantity per inch of screen, a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller screen.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a GPU.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a back-facing camera with more megapixels.
Asus ZenFone 5Q has a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.