Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2018-06-11 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's overall score of 72.6. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy S7 Active is a notably older, way thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the Asus ZenFone 5Q. Asus ZenFone 5Q features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels number in each display inch. The Asus ZenFone 5Q takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S7 Active not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.