Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is better than Asus ZenFone 5Q's 72.6 score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer device than Asus ZenFone 5Q, although it's way heavier and way thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 5Q. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of display. Asus ZenFone 5Q shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has improved battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 36% more battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Asus ZenFone 5Q. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Asus ZenFone 5Q, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.