Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than Asus ZenFone 5Q, having an 81 score against 72.6. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, it is extremely thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Asus ZenFone 5Q, although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 5Q. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery life than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 23% more battery capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger camera aperture, they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.